Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Different versions of 802?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    HB Super Moderator
    Different versions of 802?


    Altec Best's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 10th, 2008
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    4,256
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    16 Post(s)

    Re: Different versions of 802?

    Posting pictures will go a long way in helping you determine what you have.As you are a new member you may have to wait a couple days.But anyway "Welcome to the Board"

  2. #2
    Senior Hostboard Member bowtie427ss's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 24th, 2006
    Location
    Rural NY
    Posts
    3,901
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    26 Post(s)

    Re: Different versions of 802?

    Old style(60's) on the left, new style(70's) on the right.

    forums

  3. #3
    Inactive Member Coendert2011's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 7th, 2011
    Posts
    55
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Different versions of 802?

    Thanks for the welcome!

    Bowtie's pictures illustrate the external differences perfectly. I have different rear caps on the rough units though. Also I ( mistakenly?) reversed the dating. I took a fait little stamp on the side of the polepiece for a date code. That suggested 60 something for the rough ones (right in the pic above) and 70 something for the other ones.

    I am still curious about the weight difference. Is is due to a smaller magnet, less casing material or both?

    The lighter, smaller and smooth units do seem to have a little less output, yet sound fine nevertheless.

  4. #4
    Senior Hostboard Member Steve Schell's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 30th, 2003
    Posts
    414
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Different versions of 802?

    The later 802s used a cast pot structure rather than one welded from pipe and plate stock. Dare I suggest that this was likely a cost saving measure, as with the Tangerine phasing plug? I do know that the cast pot assemblies on JBL cone speakers were begun in 1953 as a cost saving measure.

  5. #5
    Senior Hostboard Member GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 26th, 2002
    Location
    Chamblee, Ga.
    Posts
    4,967
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    48 Post(s)

    Re: Different versions of 802?

    Quote Originally Posted by Coendert2011 View Post
    The lighter, smaller and smooth units do seem to have a little less output, yet sound fine nevertheless.
    They are both rated at 15,250 Gauss and both should weigh the same at ~7 lbs, but the later 802G design has its BW shifted up a little higher to make it better overall with the M19's ~1200 Hz XO as well as do a better job of reproducing the increased HF BW output around that time. The trade-off is that the 'G' isn't as strong down low when XO'd at 500 Hz which with today's very low output impedance systems is actually a good thing overall.

    GM
    Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.

  6. #6
    Inactive Member Coendert2011's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 7th, 2011
    Posts
    55
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Different versions of 802?

    According to my converter 7lbs is 3,175 gram.

    The slightly smaller smooth units weigh about 2,550 gram or 5,62 lbs.

    They are not the 'tangerine' g version, but have ordinary circular slots. I xo around 750 hz with a second order LR.

    I will try to make some illustrative photos and post them here (if possible).

  7. #7
    Senior Hostboard Member bowtie427ss's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 24th, 2006
    Location
    Rural NY
    Posts
    3,901
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    26 Post(s)

    Re: Different versions of 802?

    The slightly smaller smooth units weigh about 2,550 gram or 5,62 lbs.
    The lighter, smaller and smooth units do seem to have a little less output, yet sound fine nevertheless.
    Those are 804/806/807 motors NOT 802/808 motors.

  8. #8
    Inactive Member Coendert2011's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 7th, 2011
    Posts
    55
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Different versions of 802?

    Quote Originally Posted by bowtie427ss View Post
    Those are 804/806/807 motors NOT 802/808 motors.
    In a 802 casing?

    As I understand the 804 etc casing is even smaller....

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This forum has been viewed: 27889751 times.